Genoa bridge collapse: Seven experts offer initial thoughts
04 September 2018
Before: The 1,182m Morandi bridge, completed in 1967, had needed several rounds of maintenance work over the past decades
Following the collapse of Genoa’s Morandi bridge, investigators are examining what could have caused such a disastrous failure. A huge tower and sections of the bridge – measuring about 200m – collapsed on to railway lines, a river and a warehouse some 45m below. The motorway operator said work to shore up the bridge’s foundation was being carried out at the time.
According to the BBC, Autostrade per l’Italia admitted in 2011 the bridge had been suffering from degradation due to heavy traffic.
Built in the 1960s, the Morandi bridge stands on the A10 toll motorway, an important conduit for goods traffic from local ports, which also serves the Italian Riviera and southeast coast of France.
Engineers Ireland registrar Damien Owens spoke on RTÉ’s ‘Morning Ireland’ about the possible causes of the Morandi bridge collapse in Genoa and the link to the radio clip is here.
Also, read Sean Brady’s article on Why do bridges fail, which was published in the Engineers Journal in April 2018.
Expert reaction to the tragedy
The UK’s Science Media Centre has published the following seven experts’ reaction to the bridge disaster.
1.) Dr Maria Rosaria Marsico, senior lecturer in structural engineering at the University of Exeter:
“It is too early to comment on the causes of this tragedy, and in respect of the victims and their families, speculations should be avoided until scientific evidences are gathered.
“The bridge that collapsed is part of the Polcevera Creek Viaduct in Genoa, Italy. It was built in a densely crowded urban area which is occupied by two railroad yards, large industrial plants and the Polcevera Creek. The bridge is known as Morandi bridge from its designer, the engineer Riccardo Morandi. Its construction started in 1963 and was completed in 1967 when it was opened.
“It was a beautiful expression of the engineering design. The viaduct includes three cable-stayed spans and a series of minor spans for a total length of about 1,182m. The three largest spans consist of independent cable-stayed structures, each carried by an individual reinforced concrete pier and tower 90m high. The longest span that collapsed was about 210m long.
“The cable-stayed systems was characterised by the adoption of pre-stressed concrete stays, a common feature of bridges designed by Riccardo Morandi in the 1960s. The viaduct was subject to maintenance work since it was built and in the 1990s a complex intervention of repair was carried out involving the installation of conventional steel tendons which are flanking the existing concrete stays.”
2.) Based on speculation in some reports about a lightning strike, Dr Martin Fullekrug, Reader in the University of Bath’s Department of Electronic & Electrical Engineering:
How powerful is lightning?
“Very often, it is quoted that lightning can be as powerful as a nuclear power plant. Yet, it is normally not pointed out that this power only takes effect over an extremely short amount of time, typically just a few tens of a millionth of a second, such that the impact of lightning often remains quite limited.
What sort of damage can it cause?
“Lightning often has indirect effects, such as on consumer electronics when it strikes unprotected buildings. However, in the worst case, it can also have direct effects such as melting metal, ignite forest fires and kill people, animal herds and trees.
Could a lightning strike cause a structure such as a concrete bridge to collapse?
“While it is perhaps not impossible to think that a lightning strike makes a contribution to such a collapse, it is probably very unlikely to happen. Lightning could potentially contribute to a critical fatigue of material. For example, the lightning generated heat could result in evaporating water to very high pressure and produce a subsequent crack or burst of critical support material, similar to the bark of a tree disintegrating after a lightning strike. In theory, in might be also possible that the lightning strikes a critical metal bolt such that its function becomes impaired. But again, any such kind of scenarios are rather speculative.
What sort of things can be done to structures to mitigate damage from lightning strikes?
“The most important is to follow the guidelines for lightning protection as set out by the standardising institution in the respective country. These guidelines are normally based on the long-term experience with lightning damage and take into account scientific evidence that is constantly updated, based on new knowledge that is generated. In this extreme case, a careful investigation of what might have happened seems to be particularly important to avoid similar scenarios in the future.”
3.) Dr Mehdi Kashani, associate professor in structural mechanics, University of Southampton:
“At this stage it is very difficult to make a solid judgment on the cause of this catastrophic collapse. The bridge was constructed using reinforced and pre-stressed concrete about 50 years ago.
“There are a large number of reinforced concrete bridges in Italy, Europe, USA, and Canada with the same age, which are suffering from corrosion of reinforcement and or pre-stressing tendon. Recent research showed that corrosion of reinforcement changes the long-term behaviour of ageing reinforced concrete bridges.
“In addition, bridges are constantly subjected to cyclic dynamic loading due to highway traffic, wind and/or major/minor earthquake, which will result in fatigue damage in bridge components.
“It is reported that this bridge collapsed during a heavy storm. Therefore, dynamic wind loading, combined with additional loading due to ongoing work on the bridge, and reduced capacity due to corrosion and fatigue might be the cause of failure.
“However, there is need for further detailed investigation to fully understand the cause of failure. The bridge engineering research community should take this seriously in their future research to improve the resilience of our infrastructure under extreme loading.”
4.) Dr Demitrios Cotsovos, associate professor, Institute of Infrastructure and Environment, Heriot-Watt University:
“This is a tragic event. One should consider all possibilities before drawing any conclusions. It is important to investigate in detail the reasons that have led to such a catastrophic collapse.
“Potentially, there are lessons to be learnt from such an event. Aging infrastructure and its impact on structural integrity and safety should become of prime concern to structural engineers.
“The potential impact of the environment and extreme weather conditions (possibly associated with climate change) also needs to be assessed. The need for monitoring structural performance, understanding the causes of the exhibited collapse and developing reliable assessment methods is essential so that events like this can be avoided in the future.”
5.) Tim Ibell, FREng, professor of civil engineering, University of Bath:
“The causes of this tragedy are yet to be uncovered. But uncovered they shall be by skilled structural engineers who will look for telltale signs of initiation of failure.
“It is of no comfort to today’s victims and their families, but the reality is that the beautiful, enormous bridge structures we see all over the world stand safely due to the extraordinary abilities of structural engineers. It is when we are hit by such tragedy, thankfully so rarely, that we realise just how important the work of these engineers really is.”
6.) Prof Gordon Masterton, Chair of Future Infrastructure, School of Engineering, University of Edinburgh:
“This is a terrible and tragic event and needs to be investigated thoroughly and forensically, gathering the best engineering minds available to ensure that the root cause is identified.
“Only then can there be any confidence on the likely trigger and sequence of events. Until that detailed inquiry, we really should not be speculating. There are several potential triggers for what appears to have happened and until more evidence is obtained from the debris, the eyewitness accounts and the videos, it is unproductive and disrespectful to speculate as to whether one is more likely than the others.”
7.) Ian Firth, past president of the Institution of Structural Engineers, and a structural engineer specialising in bridges:
“It is too early to say what caused the tragic collapse, but as this reinforced and pre-stressed concrete bridge has been there for 50 years it is possible that corrosion of tendons or reinforcement may be a contributory factor.
“There are no obvious signs to say what specifically triggered the collapse at this time; the fact that there was reported to be a storm at the time may or may not be particularly relevant. In addition, ongoing work on the bridge may or may not be partly responsible for the collapse.
“The bridge is a very unusual design, very similar to its much larger cousin, the Lake Maracaibo bridge in Venezuela, also designed by Riccardo Morandi and completed six years earlier in 1962. The A-frame towers, which support the concrete-encased stay cables, combine with V-shaped supports below the deck to create a stiff arrangement, which is not common in cable stayed bridges.
“This deals with potential unbalanced loads which arise due to the multi-span nature of the structure. As yet, there is no evidence to say whether any impact occurred; it is too early to say what triggered the collapse.”
Sean Brady’s article on Why do bridges fail can be read here.http://www.engineersjournal.ie/2018/09/04/genoa-bridge-collapse-seven-experts-offer-initial-thoughts/http://www.engineersjournal.ie/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/a-abrid-1024x576.jpghttp://www.engineersjournal.ie/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/a-abrid-300x300.jpgNewsbridges,concrete,Italy